Main business
The Commission for Discipline Inspection of the General Administration held a video conference in 2020 for the secretaries of the discipline inspection commissions of its directly affiliated units to report on their work and integrity over the first half of the year.
Release date:
2020-08-16 14:41
Source:
On the morning of August 6, the Commission for Discipline Inspection of the General Administration held its semi-annual work report and integrity review meeting for the secretaries of discipline inspection committees of its directly affiliated units. The meeting was chaired by Zhu Zibao, Deputy Secretary of the Commission for Discipline Inspection of the General Administration, and attended by Wang Yong, Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee and Secretary of the Commission for Discipline Inspection of the General Administration, who also delivered a speech.
At the meeting, the discipline inspection commission secretaries from 11 directly affiliated units each delivered a semi‑annual work and integrity report. Units with Party general branches (or sub‑branches) submitted their respective briefing materials. Additionally, five units under the dual leadership of the General Administration’s Discipline Inspection Commission and the China National Coal Administration’s Discipline Inspection Commission dispatched representatives to attend and listen to the proceedings.
After hearing the reports, Wang Yong fully commended the disciplinary inspection work of the discipline inspection commissions at all levels for the first half of the year, noting that these commissions have effectively served as advisors and assistants to their respective Party committees, aligning their efforts with the committees’ priorities and ensuring continued progress in building a sound Party conduct and clean governance and in combating corruption. The role of the discipline inspection commissions in supervising implementation, providing safeguards, and promoting improvement and development has become increasingly evident; their awareness of serving the overall central tasks has been further strengthened, giving their work greater focus and concrete leverage, and generating a stronger deterrent effect. He also emphasized that the bureau’s disciplinary inspection work over the first half of the year has exhibited the following key features: first, by clarifying discipline through cases and addressing root causes, the atmosphere of “daring not to be corrupt” has been further consolidated; second, by establishing foundational frameworks and refining institutional systems, the institutional cage against corruption has been steadily tightened; and third, by moving oversight upstream and prioritizing prevention, the conscious commitment to “not wanting to be corrupt” has been further reinforced.
Wang Yong emphasized that, in the second half of the year, disciplinary inspection work must continue to uphold the overarching principle of “strictness.” He also put forward three key points for fully supporting the peer-level Party committees in implementing the responsibility system for building a sound and clean government, and for advancing high-quality development of disciplinary inspection work: First, we must get accustomed to working and living under supervision and restraint, with the Commission for Discipline Inspection striving to establish and foster an effective and robust oversight environment within our respective units; second, we should regard promoting the high‑quality development of disciplinary enforcement and investigation as a long-term priority, ensuring precise accountability; and third, we must make strengthening the ranks of discipline inspection cadres the driving force behind high‑quality development, focusing on addressing competency gaps and continuously elevating our professional standards.
At the meeting, Zhu Zibao also reported on the State Administration’s Commission for Discipline Inspection’s key achievements in the first half of the year and its work plan for the second half, while re‑deploying and re‑emphasizing relevant tasks for the near term.
The meeting was held via video conference, with over 60 participants, including members of the General Administration’s Commission for Discipline Inspection, all staff of its internal disciplinary inspection bodies, secretaries of discipline inspection commissions at directly affiliated units, commission members, and discipline inspection personnel.
Recommended Updates