Our institute convened a special conference on compliance management for overseas projects and the prevention and control of integrity risks.
Release date:
2026-03-10 15:24
Source:
Our institute convened a special conference on compliance management for overseas projects and the prevention and control of integrity risks.
On March 10, our institute convened a special meeting on compliance management for overseas projects and the prevention and control of integrity risks, thoroughly implementing the directives issued by the General Administration and the Bureau (Group) regarding overseas operations, integrity risk management, and project oversight. The meeting aimed to fully enforce accountability and fortify a dual safeguard—compliance and integrity—for all overseas projects.

The meeting focused on conveying and studying the Supervisory Advisory Letter issued by the Bureau (Group) Commission for Discipline Inspection on strengthening integrity risk prevention and control in overseas operations, and outlined four specific measures for our institute to advance implementation. Relevant functional departments provided interpretations and reminders regarding integrity and compliance risks at each stage—project acquisition, contract signing, procurement, and process approvals—and clarified the corresponding work requirements.
The meeting noted that, as one of the bureau (group)’s key units for overseas operations, our institute faces numerous practical challenges—extensive geographic coverage, long operational chains, and a wide array of business locations—along with issues such as differences in foreign laws and regulations, hidden integrity risks, and lengthy management hierarchies. All functional management departments and substantive business units must deeply recognize the critical importance of compliance and integrity risk prevention in advancing the Party’s comprehensive and rigorous governance, and, in conjunction with the ongoing study and education campaign on establishing and practicing a correct view of political achievements, further strengthen compliance and internal control management for the institute’s overseas activities.
The meeting called for a focused approach on key areas, rigorously refining the overseas compliance‑based operating framework to tighten institutional safeguards; strictly managing every stage of project implementation and reinforcing the enforceability of established rules; tightly overseeing overseas personnel to fortify disciplinary and regulatory defenses; meticulously standardizing the operation of overseas projects to uphold compliance and quality standards; and rigorously conducting risk assessments and remediation efforts to eliminate potential hazards, loopholes, and blind spots. Furthermore, it emphasized the need to firmly assign responsibilities across all parties, pool supervisory resources, and, through mechanisms such as convening meetings of the “Grand Supervision” Committee, regularly track progress on major overseas projects. The goal is to establish a long‑term, sustainable system in which Party committees take the lead, departments coordinate, and projects are effectively implemented, thereby fully leveraging the effectiveness of the “Grand Supervision” framework.
Our institute will steadfastly implement pre-departure integrity briefings and an integrity‑commitment system for personnel traveling abroad, and strengthen integrity and compliance training for staff assigned overseas. By adopting stricter standards, a more pragmatic work style, and more robust measures, we will promote the high‑quality development of our international operations and lay a solid foundation for building a distinctive brand in overseas geological services.
More than 20 individuals, including the hospital’s leadership team, senior executives, and heads of various departments, attended the meeting in a hybrid format—both online and offline.
Recommended Updates